Modern Geospatial Storage

Geospatial Data Compression & Modern Storage Formats

A focused playbook for engineering teams running spatial data at scale. Migrate legacy Shapefiles and GeoJSON to columnar, cloud-native formats like GeoParquet and FlatGeobuf, and tune the storage layer for predictable cost and query latency.

Practical guides for GIS data engineers, Python backend developers, and cloud architects — covering ZSTD level selection, row-group sizing, quadtree partitioning, schema mapping, metadata preservation, and CI/CD validation for resilient migration pipelines.

What's inside

Three connected tracks. Start with format trade-offs, then layer compression and indexing on top, and finally automate the migration end-to-end with production-grade pipelines.

Start here

New to cloud-native geospatial storage? These are the most-referenced guides — one strong entry point into each track. Read them in order to go from format choice to a tuned, automated migration.

  1. 1
    Comparing GeoParquet vs FlatGeobuf Performance

    Pick the right cloud-native format: columnar GeoParquet for analytics vs streaming FlatGeobuf for feature-by-feature reads.

  2. 2
    ZSTD Compression Levels for Geospatial Data

    Choose a ZSTD level that balances file size, write cost, and query latency for vector and raster workloads.

  3. 3
    Building Batch Conversion Pipelines with Python

    Automate Shapefile and GeoJSON migration to GeoParquet with schema mapping, parallel execution, and validation.